Contact and Corrections

If a page on this static site appears unclear, outdated, or mismatched to the visible product category, the best correction is specific evidence. Note the page title, the sentence that needs review, and the public source that supports the correction.

We do not need private desk photos, purchase receipts, account numbers, customer records, or confidential office documents. Please avoid sending personal paperwork or internal company forms when describing an issue with a public article.

Useful feedback includes broken links, image problems, repeated paragraphs, confusing wording, missing disclosure context, or a product-fit detail that should be more precise. For letter trays and paper sorters, measurements, material descriptions, and workflow terms are especially important.

Because this is a simple published site, there is no member account, comment area, or support ticket portal on the page itself. Corrections are handled as editorial maintenance rather than as private customer service.

When a correction is accepted, the goal is to make the public page clearer for the next reader: better labels, more accurate cautions, cleaner link context, and less generic organizing language.

For example, a useful note might say that a vertical sorter needs more rear clearance than the article suggests, or that a tray material description should distinguish powder-coated metal from thin plastic mesh.

A less useful note would send a private receipt or a photo of confidential paperwork. Keep feedback public, narrow, and evidence-based so the article can be improved without exposing anyone’s office records.

When reporting image issues, describe the visible problem rather than sending private alternatives. A note such as “the page shows a broken image” or “the photo looks unrelated to desk paperwork” is enough for an editorial review.